In James Baldwin’s essay, “Many
Thousands Gone,” many topics are brought up and discussed about how Americans
are made and the history of “Negros”. Baldwin believes that Americans are made
at a point when they “reject all other ties, any other history, and himself”
(29) to adopt themselves to the land. He says that Americans, in a sense,
reinvent themselves to be new and pure. Baldwin believes this a problem that
all Americans face and he says it “baffles the immigrant,” (29) this confusion
and problem occurs because without the past many people would not be able to
know how to describe themselves. The statement of how Americans are made may
have been true during the time when Baldwin wrote this essay, but I do not
believe this statement would be agreed with by many people today because people
have learned to describe themselves through use of hyphenated terms. Today many
Americans may combine their ethnicity or race with American, such as African
American, Latino American and a variety of other terms. There is still much
discussion about the creation of hyphenated terms in America because people
still believe it is not such a great thing.
When it comes to talking about the
history of the “Negro”, Baldwin goes on to state that “the Negro past was taken
from him whether he would or not” (29). I believe this is true because not very
many people feel comfortable talking about the past when it comes how African
Americans came to be where they are now. It was a touchy topic when Baldwin
discussed it in his essay and it will continue to be a touchy topic because as
Baldwin mentions, it was a shameful history for “Negros”. Although the history
of the “Negro” is not often discussed, with Baldwin’s statement I am sure that
even if African Americans wanted to discuss their history, it would have been
frowned upon. Throughout the entire essay Baldwin mentions how Americans are
often ashamed and would rather look the other way as if the “Negro” past did
not occur and all is fine between blacks and whites.
Baldwin then uses a sarcastic tone when
stating, “Shameful, for he was heathen as well as black and would never have
discovered the healing blood of Christ had not we braved the jungles to bring
him these glad tidings” (29). When Baldwin adds these sentences I feel as if he
is mocking the many Americans who think that if it had not been for those
“brave” men who went into jungles to capture people and bring them to America
as slaves, they would not be here today. Baldwin’s use of sarcasm throughout
the essay was helpful to distinguish points where he was more upset.
Here is a link to some discussion on the
topic of the creation of hyphenation in America: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AHyphenated_American
Jackie,
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I think that your point about new citizens' increased ease of identification with a diverse forms of Americanness is really valid. Regardless of the controversy about terms, our freedom to choose how to present ourselves in ways that acknowledge our cultural origins is remarkable.
I think that classes like this one and other courses on diverse topics here at UT and at other universities further individuals' ability to come to terms with the past while recognizing the achievements of the last fifty years.
Baldwin's sarcasm definitely indicates a fresh cultural wound - one that began to heal somewhat during the Civil Rights movement but remains scarred over today.